Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mentzer

Citations

  • 162 Pa. 646
  • 29 A. 720
  • 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1035

Syllabus

<p>Criminal law — Indictment—Duplicity—Pleading—Embezzlement—Act 0y March 31, 1860, section 65.</p> <p>Where a statute makes two or more distinct acts connected with the *4a.infl transaction indictable, each one of which may be considered as representing phase in the same offence, the different acts may be coupled in one count. It is not regarded as duplicity thus to join successive statuphases of the same offence.</p> <p>The four acts specified in the act of March.31, 1860, § 65, relating to embezzlement by public officers, may be four distinct and separate offences, or they may be so entirely parts of the same transaction that they combine to make but one. Into which category they fall must depend on the facts of each case, and therefore must raise a question for the jury. That being so there is no legal difficulty in joining two or more such acts in one count.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if criminal acts were “successive steps in but one taking of the same public money they would amount to but one crime in fact, and it is not to be supposed that the statute intended ... [multiple punishments]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.