· 3/25/2011
Commonwealth v. Mentzer
Citations
- 18 A.3d 1200
- 2011 Pa. Super. 62
- 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 75
- 2011 WL 1089631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding appellant not entitled to relief where he was not prejudiced by amendment
- affirming decision to amend information which requested at the time of sentencing and concerned the grading of the DUI offense
- affirming trial court’s finding of no prejudice where Commonwealth sought to amend information after trial but before sentencing
- Appellant not entitled to relief where he was not prejudiced by amendment
- citations, quotation marks, brackets, ellipsis, and unnecessary capitalization omitted
- upholding amendment of information at sentencing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Panella, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.