Skip to main content
· 3/25/2011

Commonwealth v. Mentzer

Citations

  • 18 A.3d 1200
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 62
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 75
  • 2011 WL 1089631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant not entitled to relief where he was not prejudiced by amendment
  • affirming decision to amend information which requested at the time of sentencing and concerned the grading of the DUI offense
  • affirming trial court’s finding of no prejudice where Commonwealth sought to amend information after trial but before sentencing
  • Appellant not entitled to relief where he was not prejudiced by amendment
  • citations, quotation marks, brackets, ellipsis, and unnecessary capitalization omitted
  • upholding amendment of information at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Panella, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.