Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/16/1994
Commonwealth v. Melson
Citations
- 637 A.2d 633
- 432 Pa. Super. 1
- 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 406
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that entry of stipulation as to affair between witness and defendant was adequate to cure failure to cross-examine witness on affair and possible revenge motive
- stating that failure to develop an argument constitutes waiver of claim
- witness’ refusal to testify despite a court order to do so constitutes unavailability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Olszewski, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-04· cited 332×
- Commonwealth v. LuktischSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-25· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-13· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-09-07· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. HerrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-04-25· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. CampionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-29· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. A.W. Robl TransportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-17· cited 19×
- Blasi v. Attorney General of Com. of PennsylvaniaM.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-10-02· cited 9×
- Plastipak Packaging, Inc. v. DePasqualeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-26· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-13· cited 6×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 704×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 216×
- Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-30· cited 160×
- Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-30· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-27· cited 121×
- Commonwealth v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-02-08· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. BazemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-16· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-22· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-30· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-11· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.