Massachusetts Appeals Court· 3/6/2006
Commonwealth v. Melo
Citations
- 65 Mass. App. Ct. 674
- 843 N.E.2d 659
- 2006 Mass. App. LEXIS 235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing allowance of motion to correct sentence where defendant \should have sought a declaratory judgment to challenge the DOC's calculation of his sentence\
- rule 42 \provides a procedure to correct clerical errors in court judgments or records of an otherwise legal 4 sentence imposed by a judge\
- no clerical error involved where defendant \did not claim that any documents or records of the court were in error\
- defendant must \use either habeas corpus or declaratory judgment procedures to challenge the DOC's calculation of a sentence\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trainor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hennessy v. SUPERINTENDENT, MASS. CORRECTIONAL INST.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-07-23· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. MorasseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-02-21· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-10-04· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-10-13· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. LunaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-12-31· cited 5×
- Cordeiro v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-12-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.