Skip to main content
· 7/23/1982

Hennessy v. SUPERINTENDENT, MASS. CORRECTIONAL INST.

Citations

  • 438 N.E.2d 329
  • 386 Mass. 848
  • 1982 Mass. LEXIS 1642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to abandon Wyeth rule that \an appeal does not lie from the issuance of the writ\
  • to qualify, a petitioner must show he or she “is eligible for immediate release from the respondent’s custody”
  • habeas corpus relief available to individual seeking remedy for events occurring after conviction and who would be entitled to immediate release upon successful petition
  • where inmate’s claim of statutory good time credits on sentence being served would not result in immediate release because of outstanding consecutive sentence, petition for habeas corpus relief did not he
  • improper failure to apply good conduct and program participation credits to sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Liacos, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.