Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. McKnight

Citations

  • 457 A.2d 1272
  • 311 Pa. Super. 460
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remand for fifing of appeal nunc pro tunc is not necessary where the record is sufficient to review the issue which would be raised on appeal and appellant has briefed those issues
  • remand for filing of appeal nunc pro tunc is not necessary where the record is sufficient to review the issue which would be raised on appeal and appellant has briefed those issues
  • resolution of appellant’s claims in the posture of a nunc pro tunc appeal serves the dual purpose of quickly remedying the denial of a direct appeal and at the same time promoting the traditional policies of judicial economy and fairness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, McEwen, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.