Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. McFarland

Citations

  • 15 Mass. App. Ct. 948
  • 445 N.E.2d 1085
  • 1983 Mass. App. LEXIS 1231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecutor argued that the judge had no discretion; judge stated that he was “bound” by the statute
  • reversal where judge erroneously believed he had no discretion but to admit defendant’s prior convictions, rejecting speculative argument that exercise of discretion would have led to their admission
  • erroneous assumption that statute was imperative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.