Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/21/1999
Commonwealth v. McDonald
Citations
- 740 A.2d 267
- 1999 Pa. Super. 259
- 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that Pennsylvania requires independent corroboration in cases where there is a “‘man with a gun’ anonymous tip”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Joyce, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-04-23· cited 263×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-23· cited 177×
- Buchbinder v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1998-03-23· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-25· cited 99×
- United States v. Steven BoldSecond Circuit· 1994-03-17· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-22· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. MartinezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-23· cited 62×
- United States v. Anthony DeberrySeventh Circuit· 1996-02-22· cited 58×
- In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-01· cited 52×
- United States v. Oliver L. GibsonEleventh Circuit· 1995-09-19· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-03-01· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. KueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-22· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. DaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-09· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.