United States v. Steven Bold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding officers had reasonable suspicion when told about a “four-door gray Cadillac with three black males, one of whom was armed with a gun”
• holding “whether the police had reasonable suspicion” is a “legal conclusion”
• considering location of car in remote area of parking lot as one circumstance in reasonable suspicion analysis but basing reasonable suspicion finding on several additional suspicious circumstances
• recognizing a firearm exception to Terry in dicta
• \There is nothing in White that precludes police from acting on an anonymous tip when the information to be corroborated refers to present rather than future actions.\
• “There is nothing in White that precludes police from acting on an anonymous tip when the information to be corroborated refers to present rather than future actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).