Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mays

Citations

  • 523 A.2d 357
  • 361 Pa. Super. 554
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding prompt instruction to “completely disregard the testimony of the officer” adequately precluded further prejudice
  • high degree of prejudice when officer made direct reference to appellant’s unwillingness to give a statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Olszewski, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.