Commonwealth v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the evidence in question is not offered to prove the defendant’s guilt, but to explain a [witness’] prior inconsistent statement, however, it is admissible.”
• evidence of threats properly admitted on cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Rickabaugh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-18· cited 66×
• Commonwealth v. Collins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-10-27· cited 41×
• Lopez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-29· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Rauser
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-20· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 1,351×
• Commonwealth v. McClendon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 771×
• Commonwealth v. Buehl
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-30· cited 203×
• Commonwealth v. Pursell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-26· cited 203×
• Commonwealth v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-22· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-18· cited 85×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-06-02· cited 69×
• Commonwealth v. Carr
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-11-11· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Bryant
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-01· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-11· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Banker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-12-15· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-27· cited 1×