Commonwealth v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding prospective witness testimony whose “value and relevancy” was “doubtful”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Marinelli
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-25· cited 99×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-03· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Booth
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-06-12· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Gibson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-29· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Ulen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-30· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Kaye
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-27· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Bracero
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-12· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Davenport
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1973-01-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lopinson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-26· cited 157×
• Commonwealth v. Myers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-07-02· cited 68×
• United States v. Jack Lesley Marson
  Fourth Circuit· 1968-06-13· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-06· cited 61×
• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-05-29· cited 43×
• Lopinson v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Ross
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-07-03· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Holden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-10-07· cited 14×