Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Martin

Citations

  • 388 A.2d 1361
  • 479 Pa. 609
  • 1978 Pa. LEXIS 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Rule 1100(g) clearly contemplates a written requirement in light of the mandate that a copy be served upon the attorney for the Commonwealth
  • “While the comments to our Rules are not binding, they are useful tools for resolution of questions of interpretation under the Rules.”
  • testimony of unsequestered witness did not harm defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.