Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Marshall

Citations

  • 643 A.2d 1070
  • 537 Pa. 336
  • 1994 Pa. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant not prejudiced by comments of the trial court where the court provided instructions concerning the duty of the jury to decide the case themselves
  • holding appellant not prejudiced by comments of the trial court where the court provided instructions concerning the duty of the jury to decide the case themselves
  • conducting proportionality review of Appellant’s death sentence and finding that it was not disproportionate
  • photographs depicting victims in condition they were found as result of crimes were admissible because they assisted jury in understanding facts of victim’s death and provided “insight into the nature of the offenses”
  • photographs depicting victims in condition they were found as result of crimes were admissible because they assisted jury in understanding facts surrounding victim's death and provided “insight into the nature of the offenses”
  • applying same rationale to crime scene photographs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Montemuro, Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.