Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Marsh

Citations

  • 997 A.2d 318
  • 606 Pa. 254
  • 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that safety of the confidential informant is a controlling factor in determining whether to reveal his identity
  • holding that because Marsh failed to make the threshold showing, “his motion should have been rejected without any consideration of the other factors necessary to make a balanced evaluation”
  • stating that safety of the confidential informant is a controlling factor in determining whether to reveal his or her identity
  • stating that safety of the CI is a controlling factor in determining whether to reveal his identity
  • stating that the safety of the CI is a controlling factor in determining whether to reveal his or her identity
  • holding defendant failed to establish material need for identity disclosure where he presented no evidence, but baldly averred that the testimony was relevant to his defense of mistaken identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, McCaffery, Announcing, Todd, Former, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.