Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/20/2019

Commonwealth v. Ellison

Citations

213 A.3d 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

upholding sufficiency of evidence for convictions for criminal use of communication facility and delivery of controlled substance where text messages, CI testimony, and recording of controlled buy presented at trial
finding the evidence sufficient for a delivery of a controlled substance conviction when only an agent testified to the details of a drug deal executed by a confidential informant with the appellant
mere assertion that CI’s identity is material to defense imposes no duty on trial court to balance competing interests and determine if disclosure required
In order to preserve achallenge to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, an appellant's [Pa-R.A.P.] 1925(b
under PWID statute, delivery occurs where the defendant “physically conveys drugs to another person” regardless of whether an exchange of money takes place; “all that is necessary is that the transfer be between two people”
under PWID statute, delivery occurs where the defendant “physically conveys drugs to another person” regardless of whether an exchange of money takes place; “all that is necessary is that the transfer be between two people”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Murray, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.