Commonwealth v. March

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here an accused is charged with corruption by one act, and the Commonwealth does not prove that act, but proves some other act, a conviction for corruption based upon the other act cannot stand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Walker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-13· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Kopp
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-31· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-11· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-09· cited 2,071×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 1,351×
• Commonwealth v. Simione
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-20· cited 75×
• Commonwealth v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-06· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Lambert
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-16· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Hershman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-07-17· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Davison
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Bartman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-04-22· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Dimmig
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-04· cited 5×