Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mance

Citations

  • 422 Pa. Super. 584
  • 619 A.2d 1378
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where there is conflicting testimony on subject of entrapment, conflict is for jury to resolve
  • holding that where there is conflicting testimony on the subject of entrapment, the conflict is for the jury to resolve
  • holding that the entrapment defense was properly submitted to jury where operative facts as to whether the defendant was induced into - 10 - J-S52014-17 participating in the scheme were disputed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hester, Johnson, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.