Commonwealth v. Magee
Citations
- 33 Pa. Super. 257
- 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 278
Syllabus
<p>Appeals — Exceptions—Interlocutory order — Quashing appeal.</p> <p>Appeals should not be resorted to when the effect is to bring cases into the appellate courts by installments.</p> <p>No appeal lies from orders discharging rules to show cause why the plaintiff should not. have leave to file a second or amended statement of claim, and the defendant file a second affidavit of defense, where no exception has been taken to the orders, and the orders are in fact interlocutory and not final.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Yost v. DavisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-07-23· cited 13×
- Lauer v. Lauer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-04-12· cited 10×
- National Transit Co. v. United States Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-02-22· cited 7×
- City of Philadelphia ex rel. Achuff v. ChristmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-11-19· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. MageeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1904-03-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.