Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Little

Citations

  • 432 Pa. 256
  • 248 A.2d 32
  • 1968 Pa. LEXIS 513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the appellant was entitled to benefit from the rule announced in the 1966 Miranda decision, in a “nunc pro tunc [direct] appeal of a case tried on April 17, 1964”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Bfjen, Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Bkien, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.