Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lane

Citations

  • 621 A.2d 566
  • 533 Pa. 276
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court erroneously prohibited defense from cross-examining witness on all his crimes, but defense still had full and fair opportunity to cross-examine because jury was already aware that witness had pending crimes which could give rise to a pro-Commonwealth bias
  • error in prohibiting cross-examination as to the witness’ pending kidnapping and attempted rape charges was harmless where witness was cross-examined on other pending criminal offenses
  • error in prohibiting cross-examination as to the witness' pending kidnapping and attempted rape charges was harmless where witness was cross-examined on other pending criminal offenses
  • “It is particularly important that, where the determination of a defendant’s guilt or innocence is dependent upon the credibility of a prosecution witness, an adequate opportunity be afforded to demonstrate through cross-examination that the witness is biased.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.