Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/17/1964
Commonwealth v. Updegrove
Citations
- 413 Pa. 599
- 198 A.2d 534
- 1964 Pa. LEXIS 724
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence that “is admissible for one purpose ... is not inadmissible because it does not satisfy the rules applicable to some other capacity or even because the jury might consider it in the latter capacity”
- evidence that \is admissible for one purpose ... is not inadmissible because it does not satisfy the rules applicable to some other capacity or even because the jury might consider it in the latter capacity\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.