Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. LaFleur

Citations

  • 58 Mass. App. Ct. 546
  • 791 N.E.2d 380
  • 2003 Mass. App. LEXIS 749
  • 2003 WL 21584502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s physical restraint by the EMTs did not create an inherently coercive, police-dominated situation and the protections of Miranda were not triggered
  • even where claim is contained in written motion to suppress, it cannot be considered on appeal where defendant fails to press the issue actively at the motion hearing or at trial
  • even where claim is contained in written motion to suppress, it cannot be considered on appeal where defendant fails to press the issue actively at the motion hearing or at trial
  • defendant not in custody when physically restrained by EMTs during brief questioning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kafker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.