Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Kunkle

Citations

  • 623 A.2d 336
  • 424 Pa. Super. 499
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that uncorroborated testimony of the sex offense victim may be sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused
  • holding that uncorroborated testimony of the sex offense victim may be sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused
  • “[A] defendant who proposes to offer evidence of the alleged victim’s past sexual conduct must file a written motion and make a specific offer of proof at the time of trial”
  • defendant’s oral motion during trial, rather than written motion and specific offer of proof, was inadequate, and there was no abuse of discretion by trial court when it barred evidence pertaining to prior sexual assault of victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Sole, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.