Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/4/1980
Commonwealth v. Knox
Citations
- 417 A.2d 1192
- 273 Pa. Super. 563
- 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant not entitled to a mere presence instruction where the evidence established that he participated in the charged crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Voort, Wieand, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. RoebuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-31· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-10· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. GladdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-26· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-22· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-21· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-04· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. FleckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-03· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. ZabalaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-11· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. EmmiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-21· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-29· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. MartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-19· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. LiverpoolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-05· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. LomaxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-30· cited 2×
- Com. v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.