Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. King

Citations

  • 990 A.2d 1172
  • 2010 Pa. Super. 16
  • 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 14
  • 2010 WL 338137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that recusal argument was waived when the appellant did not object after judge refused to recuse himself
  • holding judge “could not possibly have made fully informed credibility determinations without observing the demeanor of the witnesses”
  • stating a judge “could not possibly have made fully informed credibility determinations without observing the demeanor of the witnesses”
  • affirming murder conviction on conspiracy theory where co-conspirator shot victim in course of committing robbery that defendant had agreed to arrange and share proceeds from
  • stating a judge “could not possibly have made fully informed credibility determinations without observing the demeanor of the witnesses”
  • stating “[e]ach co-conspirator is liable for the actions of the others if those actions were in furtherance of the common criminal design”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panelea, Shogan, Colville

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.