Commonwealth v. Pitner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a co-defendant’s prior statements relevant to his own guilty plea were admissible as substantive evidence because they were inconsistent with co-defendant’s trial testimony and he was subject to cross- examination
• holding 35 P.S. § 780-113(b) is not ambiguous and rejecting the appellant's argument that the enhanced penalty applies only to defendants who committed offenses specifically enumerated therein
• holding bag containing marijuana qualified as paraphernalia
• “[I]f the possession occurs after a prior conviction under the [Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act], the maximum term of imprisonment is three years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).