Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Kelly

Citations

  • 399 A.2d 1061
  • 484 Pa. 527
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that appellant suffered no prejudice by the submission of written notations on the verdict slip to the jury
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that appellant suffered no prejudice by the submission of written notations on the verdict slip to the jury
  • stating that it is well-settled that a criminal defendant is entitled to relevant portions of grand jury testimony
  • stating that it is well-settled that a criminal defendant is entitled to relevant portions of grand jury testimony
  • trial court submitted written notations on verdict slip in order to identify for the jury the separate counts with which the defendant was charged
  • due to complexity of charges and nature of perjury-bribery trial, court did not err in placing identifying notations for jury on verdict slip

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Larsen, Eagen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.