Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/18/1975
Commonwealth v. Kane
Citations
- 333 A.2d 925
- 460 Pa. 582
- 1975 Pa. LEXIS 698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that proof that the notice of suspension was mailed is not sufficient by itself to establish notice
- holding that mailed notice alone does not prove actual notice of a suspension
- stating that mailing the notice of suspension, without more, is insufficient to prove actual notice
- stating that it is necessary for the Commonwealth to prove that the accused had actual notice of suspension in order to sustain a conviction of driving while under suspension
- stating that it is necessary for the Commonwealth to prove that the accused had actual notice of suspension in order to sustain a conviction of driving while under suspension
- evidence offered to prove actual notice insufficient where only evidence of actual notice was notice of suspension mailed to defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. HardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-27· cited 162×
- Commonwealth v. VetriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-15· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. ZimmickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-23· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-27· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. CrockfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-08· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-05· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. BurkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-21· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-03-02· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-03· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. HeckmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-08· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-08· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-22· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. DietzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-03-08· cited 15×
- Radice v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-18· cited 15×
- Com. v. Peralta, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-02-08· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. HorneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-27· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-08· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. WarenczukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-18· cited 10×
- Commonwealth Department of Transportation v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-06· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. GibboneyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-07· cited 9×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 1,166×
- Paul v. DwyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-03-19· cited 38×
- Cameron EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-03-18· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. ValerosoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-03-06· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.