Skip to main content
· 3/8/1993

Commonwealth v. Dietz

Citations

  • 621 A.2d 160
  • 423 Pa. Super. 366
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s failure to possess a current license at the time of the incident is presumptive knowledge of suspension
  • holding driver’s flight from crash site and misleading conduct demonstrated that driver knew he was not permitted to drive; and driver’s failure to produce a driver’s license is presumptive knowledge of suspension
  • holding a defendant’s failure to possess a current license at the time of the incident is presumptive knowledge of suspension
  • holding driver’s flight from crash site and misleading conduct demonstrated that driver knew he was not permitted to drive; and driver’s failure to produce a driver's license is presumptive knowledge of suspension
  • holding driver's failure to produce a driver's license is presumptive knowledge of suspension
  • finding actual notice satisfied where, inter alia, Dietz’s conduct indicated he knew he was not permitted to drive, as Dietz fled from the scene of a traffic accident and then claimed his wife was driving when police questioned him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Popovich, Hudock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.