Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jones

Citations

  • 978 A.2d 1000
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 145
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the plain view exception was met when “officers did nothing more than illuminate activity, two individuals standing on the porch of a suspected drug house, which they could already readily observe from a lawful and non-intrusive vantage point”
  • holding use of police vehicle’s spotlight to illuminate porch of suspected drug house at night did not infringe on reasonable expectations of privacy
  • shining spotlight at night onto front porch of residence ten feet away did not violate Fourth Amendment; spotlight was shined from lawful vantage point on public street, and illuminated area would have been in plain view in daytime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Lally-Green, Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.