Skip to main content

Com. v. Smith, M.

Citations

  • 285 A.3d 328
  • 2022 Pa. Super. 187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the police officer “lacked advance notice and an opportunity to obtain a warrant before commencing [the] search, he had a lawful right of access to the interior of Appellee’s vehicle to recover the evidence”
  • observing interior of a vehicle through a window from outside the vehicle by shining a flashlight constitutes observation from a lawful vantage point
  • reversing grant of motion to suppress firearm observed in the back seat of a car during a traffic stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, P.J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Com. v. Smith, M.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.