Skip to main content
· 3/14/1988

Commonwealth v. Douglass

Citations

  • 539 A.2d 412
  • 372 Pa. Super. 227
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a three and one half hour detention, under the totality of the circumstances, was investigative rather than custodial
  • explaining that the police may institute an encounter with a suspect and request information absent any level of suspicion, however, that encounter “carries no official duty to stop or respond”
  • classifying a three hour detention as a reasonable investigative detention under the circumstances of that case
  • classifying a three hour detention as a reasonable investigative detention under the circumstances of that case
  • classifying a three hour detention as a reasonable investigative detention under the circumstances of that case
  • discussing the factors to consider in determining if a detention is “too long in duration to be justified as an investigative stop”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Kelly, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.