Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jones

Citations

  • 658 A.2d 746
  • 540 Pa. 442
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a police officer’s testimony was proper because it was not offered for the truth of the matter asserted, was admitted in order to explain police conduct, and merely repeated matters covered in testifying witnesses’ own testimony
  • suggesting that information about the police investigation was relevant to answer defense counsel's pointed attack upon the adequacy of that investigation
  • suggesting that information about the police investigation was relevant to answer defense counsel’s pointed attack upon the adequacy of that investigation
  • stating that error is harmless when the evidence of guilt is overwhelming and the error insignificant so that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict
  • stating that although “[ejvidence of a defendant’s attempt to dispose of a witness may be relevant and admissible to establish consciousness of guilt,” and despite witness’ assertion defendant tried to kill her, there was no proof that defendant gave witness tainted cocaine
  • distinguishing -6- J-S72011-18 Yates because the concern about prejudice is not present “where, as in this case, the declarant did in fact testify and the subsequent police testimony merely related matters that were covered in the declarant’s own testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.