Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Citations

  • 470 Mass. 300
  • 21 N.E.3d 937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on false accusation of child abuse as one of three acts supporting conviction of criminal harassment
  • construing element of “serious[ ] alarm[ ]” under criminal harassment statute
  • where sole purpose of defendants’ speech was to harass victims, speech was not protected by First Amendment
  • there is no First Amendment protection for electronic communications and Internet postings used to commit harassment
  • “Section § 43A[a] requires that the Commonwealth prove three or more predicate acts of harassment that were ‘directed at a specific person’ ”
  • trial court judge “acted well within his discretion” in declining to consider unsupported and undeveloped argument in support of motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants, Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Lenk, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.