Bouters v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \substantial emotional distress\ element of stalking requires application of an objective, reasonable-person standard
• holding that the \substantial emotional distress\ element of stalking requires application of an objective, reasonable-person standard
• holding that an objective, reasonable-person standard applies to the phrase “substantial emotional distress”
• stalking statute constitutional where it defined “harasses” as engaging in a course of conduct which is directed at a person, is wilful and malicious, causes substantial emotional distress, serves no legitimate purpose, and does not include constitutionally protected activity
• holding objective, reasonable-person standard applies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).