Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/30/1993
Commonwealth v. Johnson
Citations
- 631 A.2d 1335
- 429 Pa. Super. 158
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- bag of cocaine concealed in defendant’s crotch was properly seized as recognizable contraband because of the location and consistency of the object
- officer’s tactile impression and years of experience “combined sufficiently to betray the illegal nature of the object on appellee’s person,” giving officer probable cause to seize
- officer‟s tactile impression and years of experience “combined sufficiently to betray the illegal nature of the object on appellee‟s person,” giving officer probable cause to seize
- lawful pat down included crunching and squeezing
- lawful pat down included crunching and squeezing
- \[R]easonable suspicion [is] less than probable cause....\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Beck, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. GuillespieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-19· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. MesaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-23· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. StackfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-14· cited 36×
- In the Interest of S.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-05-19· cited 34×
- In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-10· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. RosenfeltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-11· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. DorseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-09· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. MoultrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-03· cited 16×
- State v. AhumadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-28· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-28· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. LateefSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-29· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. SpearsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-20· cited 4×
- United States v. CrespoM.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-07-20· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Lando Onassis AhumadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-28
- Commonwealth v. KnippBucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-03-22
- Commonwealth v. AlbarranBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-10-15
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Superior Court· 1996-06-15
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1994-11-01
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 626×
- Thompson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 326×
- Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-04· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-29· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-16· cited 50×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.