Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/20/1988
Commonwealth v. Johnson
Citations
- 541 A.2d 332
- 373 Pa. Super. 312
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a question that does not suggest an answer is not a leading question because a leading question \puts the desired answer in the mouth of the witness\
- noting failure to provide adequate “statement of reasons for the sentence imposed is reversible error requiring resentencing”
- a person must be given Miranda warnings prior to custodial interrogation by police
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, McEwen, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Iowa v. Tina Lynn ThackerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-04-17· cited 217×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-27· cited 184×
- Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-18· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. MannionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-02-05· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-09· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-22· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-18· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. EganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-21· cited 30×
- Katz v. St. Mary HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-28· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-27· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. PostellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-07· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. SmickloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-05· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. McHughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-08· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-07· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. OppelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-13· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. HollihanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-28· cited 2×
- Amended June 24, 2015 State of Iowa v. Tina Lynn ThackerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-04-17
- Commonwealth v. McHughDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1991-05-29
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 739×
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-08-17· cited 471×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-22· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-07· cited 159×
- Commonwealth v. SimalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-04-23· cited 115×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-07-08· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. DreibelbisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-13· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-18· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. SitesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. BrantnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-01· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-19· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. FlynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-20· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-27· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. McCallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-21· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. OlitskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-11· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. EckertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-12-15· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. PeppersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-30· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. WhitleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-16· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.