Commonwealth v. Jester
Citations
- 63 Pa. Super. 291
- 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 153
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Appeals — Discretion of court — ,Trial without counsel — Constitutional law — Trial by jury.</p> <p>An appeal by a prisoner in a criminal ease from an order refusing a new trial, will not be sustained, where it appears that the prisoner was placed on trial in the absence of his counsel, but the record does not show that the court below abused its legal discretion either at the trial, or in refusing a second trial, or that the defendant’s rights were not fully safeguarded by the trial judge.</p>
Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Trexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stewart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-11-07· cited 23×
- Mansfield's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-02-11· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. SpencerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-01-18· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. DarmskaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-02-28· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-01-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.