Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jerman

Citations

  • 556 S.E.2d 754
  • 263 Va. 88
  • 2002 Va. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “perceived futility” of objecting “does not excuse” a defendant from doing so because of their duty to create a record for appeal
  • holding that the “perceived futility” of objecting “does not excuse” a defendant from doing so because of their duty to create a record for appeal
  • holding that the “perceived futility” of objecting “does not excuse” a defendant from doing so because of the duty to create a record for appeal
  • holding that the “perceived futility” of objecting “does not excuse” a defendant from doing so because of the duty to create a record for appeal
  • holding that the “perceived futility” of objecting “does not excuse” a defendant from doing so because of the duty to create a record for appeal
  • providing that this “conclusion [was] not altered by” a subsequent change in the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbara Milano Keenan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.