Commonwealth v. Jackson
Citations
- 10 Pa. Super. 524
- 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 311
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Obstructing road — Fences—Road law — How boundaries determined.</p> <p>The question whether a fence is maintained within the limits of a public road is a question of fact for the jury and depends upon the location of the defendant’s fence with reference to the road as actually opened by the supervisors; offers of evidence by the commonwealth to show that the fence as erected by defendant was within the limits of the road as laid out by the viewers are inadmissible. The defendant is guilty only if he maintains his fence within twenty feet from the center of the generally traveled track as it was originally opened and not as laid out on paper by the court.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Beeber, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 59×
- KAMERER v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-01-03· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. Plymouth TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-02-14· cited 4×
- Boyd v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1914-07-15· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. SlagelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-05-13
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.