Commonwealth v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant is not entitled to a new trial after improper introduction of a photograph or reference thereto unless, in a particular case, there is reasonable doubt that such error influenced the jury’s verdict of guilt
• defendant is not entitled to a new trial after improper introduction of a photograph or reference thereto unless, in a particular case, there is reasonable doubt that such error influenced the jury's verdict of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-13· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Clark
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-22· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Everett
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-02· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Harvey
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-20· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Bey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-06· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Bricker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-26· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Story
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 730×
• Commonwealth v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 242×
• Commonwealth v. Carlos
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-07-07· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. McFadden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Robinson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-03-24· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Wilson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-02-02· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-21· cited 3×