Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 4/2/1979

Commonwealth v. Imbruglia

Citations

  • 387 N.E.2d 559
  • 377 Mass. 682
  • 1979 Mass. LEXIS 1099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \delay after the prosecution has acquired sufficient knowledge to begin proceedings does not require a judge to conclude that the delay was improper\
  • evidence of the defendant’s other fencing activities within the same time period as the crime alleged was probative of his knowledge that the goods were stolen
  • in a stolen securities and counterfeiting case, other similar schemes of the defendant carried out during the same period of time of the subject indictments admissible on the issue of intent, motive, and method
  • receiving stolen securities and possession of counterfeit currency
  • receiving stolen securities and possession of counterfeit currency
  • pretrial delay intentionally undertaken to gain tactical advantage is impermissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Kaplan, Liacos, Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Imbruglia

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.