Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 9/5/1980

Commonwealth v. Best

Citations

410 N.E.2d 731
381 Mass. 472
1980 Mass. LEXIS 1297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

requiring defendant to show prosecutorial delay is prejudicial to defense and “has been intentionally undertaken to gain a tactical advantage over the accused or has been incurred in reckless disregard of known risks to the putative defendant’s ability to mount a defense”
trial judge may reasonably control scope of cross-examination, “particularly, perhaps, when directed to showing a witness’s bias”
“That the case against [the defendant] was ‘circumstantial’ in some sense of that dubious term does not suggest that the proof was insufficient”
argument “not so much grounded on the failure to sever as on the right to cross-examine adequately”
\General or conclusory allegations on such issues are insufficient for the drastic remedy of dismissal\
convincing proof can consist of probable, if not necessary, inferences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Kaplan, Wilkins, Liacos, Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.