Commonwealth v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “both the language of Rule 588 and the caselaw interpreting it mandate that resolution of disputed facts await presentation of evidence at a hearing”
• holding “both the language of Rule 588 and the caselaw interpreting it mandate that resolution of disputed facts await presentation of evidence at a hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Matsinger
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-06-18· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. All that Certain Lot or Parcel of Land Located at 605 University Drive
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-21· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Morelli
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-07· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Crosby
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-03· cited 36×
• In re One 1988 Toyota Corolla
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-30· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Fontanez
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-10-28· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Pomerantz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-23· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Younge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-06· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Crespo
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-14· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Wintel, Inc.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-29· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Doranzo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-23· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-01· cited 12×