Skip to main content
· 7/29/2003

Commonwealth v. Wintel, Inc.

Citations

  • 829 A.2d 753
  • 2003 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the three-part test and finding that the video slot machines were gambling devices per se
  • applying the three-part test and finding that the video slot machines were gambling devices per se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pellegrini, Leavitt, Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.