Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Houtz

Citations

  • 982 A.2d 537
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 186
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3284
  • 2009 WL 2951926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a broad internet restriction without a nexus to the crime is punitive, unduly restrictive, and incompatible with freedom of conscience
  • holding that a broad internet restriction without a nexus to the crime is punitive, unduly restrictive, and incompatible with freedom of conscience
  • concluding that appellant raised a substantial question, where she argued that the conditions of her probation were not reasonably related to her rehabilitation or reasonably tailored to her unique rehabilitative needs
  • holding challenge to probation condition generally challenges the discretionary aspects of sentence and not the legality of the sentence imposed
  • holding challenge to probation condition generally challenges the discretionary aspects of sentence and not the legality of the sentence imposed
  • stating that where a defendant claims that the trial court’s probation condition is “not reasonably related” to the conviction, it is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Popovich, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.