Commonwealth v. House
Citations
- 10 Pa. Super. 259
- 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 268
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Effect of pardon of convicted principal as to an accessory to the crime.</p> <p>The sole intent and purpose of a pardon is to relieve the particular person to whom it is granted; it is not intended to benefit any other person or persons; it is restricted to the person and limited to the offense described.</p> <p>The fact that a principal convicted of embezzlement has been .pardoned does not operate to relieve a person on trial as accessory to the offense for which said principal has been pardoned.</p> <p>Evidence — Proof of guilt of a principal.</p> <p>On the trial of prisoner indicted for being accessory to an embezzlement it is necessary to prove the guilt of the principal and this may be proved by the record of his conviction or by evidence aliunde.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Beeber, Orlad, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hunter v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-03· cited 123×
- Commonwealth v. SutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-07· cited 112×
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court· 1951-03-21· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-06-25· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-23· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. HomisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 16×
- Cohen v. BARGERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-25· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. SwabSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-03-11· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. J.C.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-28· cited 5×
- United States ex rel. Forino v. GarfinkelW.D. Pennsylvania· 1947-01-22· cited 2×
- Com. v. CSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-23
- Com. v. JCKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-28
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court· 1867-01-14· cited 795×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-01-04· cited 267×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1833-01-26· cited 235×
- United States v. MillsSupreme Court· 1833-03-12· cited 117×
- Commonwealth v. HouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-12-13· cited 52×
- Buck v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1884-10-31· cited 49×
- People v. KiefNew York Court of Appeals· 1891-05-05· cited 48×
- Diehl v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1895-07-18· cited 34×
- State v. FoleyNevada Supreme Court· 1880-01-15· cited 22×
- Baker v. Agricultural Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1900-06-09· cited 12×
- United States v. LancasterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania· 1821-04-15· cited 9×
- County of Schuylkill v. ReifsnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1864-02-01· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. HouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-01-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.