Commonwealth v. Horshaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “issue of concealment depends upon the particular circumstances present in each case, and is a question for the trier of fact”
• finding evidence sufficient where no direct evidence of concealment was presented to the jury, holding \The evidence was I 1 !' I sufficient to allow the jury to infer that the appellant concealed the gun.\ Id.
• robbery victim testified that Horshaw pulled gun from his abdomen and victim first saw it when it was coming up by Horshaw’s side
• robbery victim testified that Horshaw pulled gun from his abdomen and victim first saw it when it was coming up by Horshaw's side

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).