Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Coleman

Citations

  • 532 A.2d 477
  • 367 Pa. Super. 108
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the effect of an arrest of judgment and why the Commonwealth may appeal from an order granting arrest of judgment
  • for double jeopardy purposes crucial distinction must be made between pre-conviction and post-conviction determinations of insufficiency of the evidence
  • operability inferentially established by eyewitnesses who heard gunshots, turned, and saw defendant holding a firearm with smoke surrounding his head
  • “[f]or one hundred and seventy-five (175) years appellate courts of this Commonwealth have properly entertained appeals by the Commonwealth from orders granting a defendant arrest of judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Kelly, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.